Undertreatment in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Aim: To assess rates of no systemic treatment (NST), attrition across lines of therapy, and factors influencing treatment selection in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC).

Methods: Systematic literature review to identify real-world studies reporting NST or attrition rates in la/mUC from 2017–2022 (including data reported since 2015).

Results: Of 2439 publications screened, 29 reported NST rates, ranging from 40–74% in eight European-based studies, 14–60% in 12 US-based studies, and 9– 63% in nine studies in other locations (meta-analysis estimate, 39%). Factors associated with NST or no second-line therapy included older age, female sex, poor performance status, poor renal function and distant metastases.

Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients with la/mUC do not receive guidelinerecommended treatment.



Previous
Previous

Strategic Evidence Generation Planning: Objectives, Requirements, and Processes

Next
Next

Medical Chart Reviews as a Method for Real-World Data Generation: Objectives, Processes, and Challenges